Blindspot!
Authoritarianism
Textual literalism is not
necessarily connected with intolerance, political radicalism or
violence. On the positive side, the insistence of the Salafiyya on
comparing societal practices with the practices of the early Muslim
community allowed for the abandonment of some unjust customs, like the
exclusion of women from the mosque. On the other hand, this approach can
degenerate into a simplistic and literalist reading of the Quran and
the Sunna. In particular, literalistic readings often diminish the
relevance of historical context for understanding the true meaning of
the Quran and the Prophet's Sunna. Such readings also give little
attention to the need to reconcile particular rulings with general
principles and values articulated in the Quran and the Sunna. Finally,
literalistic readings can efface the role of the human interpreter. Decrying
"man-made" institutions, literalists seem unaware of their own roles as
human interpreters when they select particular passages to justify
their positions.
At the same time, we must
also recognize that many Muslims who practice what might be called a
"liberal" reading of the Quran can be as intolerant of other opinions as
their ideological opponents. Intolerance is rooted in the belief that one's own reading is obviously correct,
whether that reading is based on a literalistic approach to the text or
on a conviction that (one's own) reason is such a perfect instrument
for assessing truth, justice, and fairness that interpretations in
conflict with that assessment are dismissed out of hand. This attitude
is not just intolerant, but, in contemporary scholar Khaled Abou El
Fadl's words, "authoritarian." He says, "Authoritarianism
is the act of 'locking' or captivating the Will of the Divine, or the
will of the text, into a specific determination, and then presenting
this determination as inevitable, final, and conclusive."
|
No comments:
Post a Comment